|Wesley R. Elsberry
Joined: May 2002
|Quote (OgreMkV @ Nov. 14 2012,08:03)|
|Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 14 2012,02:27)|
|And I can easily say that a human is an intelligent designer. And cellular intelligence is the intelligent designer of the intelligent human. And molecular intelligence is the intelligent designer of the intelligent cells. |
Your point is now what? That you cannot accept that as making scientific sense because your scientific method requires a deity of some stature in a scientific theory for you to accept it as scientific?
The logical fallacies in this regurgitation are just stunning.
1) Assuming the claim "cells have intelligence"
2) false extension "cellular intelligence designed human intelligence"
3) Assuming the claim "molecules have intelligence"
4) false extension "molecular intelligence designed cellular intelligence"
Gary, do you have any idea what "evidence" is?
Do you have ANY evidence for ANYTHING you have said?
Gary is simply continuing the same confusion and conflation of "ordinary design" with "rarefied design" that underlies the rest of the "intelligent design" creationism movement. His difference with the rest is that he appears to have a stepwise approach rather than an all-one-lump sort of thing.
"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker