RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (340) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: A Separate Thread for Gary Gaulin, As big as the poop that does not look< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Quack



Posts: 1720
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 13 2012,16:08   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 13 2012,12:30)
 
Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Nov. 13 2012,11:58)
 
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 13 2012,11:48)
But I do mention intelligent living things likely having been here for several billion years, so that the time scale used for all else in between is what is already used in science.

Were there "intelligent designers" around billions of years ago then?

For example?

What do you consider to be an "intelligent designer"? Do they have to have a beard and be a he who magically zaps stuff into existence with their finger sort of thing?

No no, not with fingers. Invisible, with magic, pure and simple like it behoves a deity of some stature!

--------------
The fundamental choice to be made, given the available information, is not whether chance provides a better explanation than design, but whether natural laws provide a better explanation than a design. - Sean Devine.

  
  10179 replies since Oct. 31 2012,02:32 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (340) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]