Joined: Oct. 2009
|Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 12 2012,09:15)|
|Quote (OgreMkV @ Nov. 12 2012,08:30)|
|Yes, I see the differences.|
One describes actual things that are actually happening in the real world and was developed using a significant amount of evidence from observation and experiment.
The other does not describe real things. It has no evidential support.
I hope none actually expect me to feed that troll too. In this case they are essentially parroting old political slogans while clouding the issue with another pompous lecture.
It should be clear enough that there are two entirely different models, and they need way more than a brush-off to make the one for Intelligent Causation go away.
Let's see, I ask for evidence and I'm called a troll.
I continue to remind you that you have unanswered issues with your paper and I'm ignored.
We're on page 16 here and you have yet to actually use your model to do anything or even explain it.
Can't say I'm surprised. Let's try it in a way that creationists might understand.
DO YOU HAVE ANY EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT YOUR MODEL!?!?!?!?
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.