Southstar
Posts: 150 Joined: Nov. 2011
|
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 03 2012,08:46) | Quote (Southstar @ Nov. 03 2012,04:35) | The best I can do is say that if the intelligence is not the source of what you qualified as "random" then answer to one is yes.
Number 2 and 3 are still as ambiguous. End up reading:
2) a random sequence and a sequence designed by an apple 3) a sequence designed by apple and a sequence that is apple designed
Without further information, it's nonsense to the theory. The problem is in expecting scientific yes/no answers to questions that likely assume there is no intelligence in nature yet intelligence exists naturally, so right away there are paradoxes that only help show why ID arguments like this are inherently nonsensical to even ask. And I'm honestly not trying to be evasive. The logic of the theory requires unambiguous yes/no questions to answer, not generalizations from philosophy like "nature" and "designed by nature".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.......osophy)
Philosophy is not science. Therefore the second two are not even scientific questions, they are philosophical questions. At their core, are questions that begin here, which do agree with theory:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v....S5IrO0I |
|
Okay here is an example of 1
here I present two nucleotide sequences one is random the other is designed by me (an inteligent agent). Please indicate which is which and show us your work:
A) GGC GTT ACTC B) GGG CTT ATCC
i'll put examples of 2 and 3 lets see if it will help:
2) a random sequence and a sequence found in nature.
Here is an example again one sequence is random the other exists in nature: Which is which.
A) ACT CGT CGTG B) GAT CTC CGTG
3) a sequence found in nature and one created by an inteligent agent..
Here is another set of sequences, one exists in nature the other is created by an intelligent agent (me): Which is which.
A) CCG AGT TCAA B) GCC ATG AACT
-------------- "Cows who know a moose when they see one will do infinitely better than a cow that pairs with a moose because they cannot see the difference either." Gary Gaulin
|