Joined: Oct. 2005
Gary, you really need to focus on writing better. Keep your sentences shorter and less wandering.
|But you have to empirically contradict ("falsify") it, not oblige me to an endless cycle that makes it seem I have to do that|
Actually, in science, the burden is on the guy with the new paradigm. He has to prove it's more useful than the old paradigm.
ID needs people (1)creating an actual model, (2)using it to generate specific predictions about the real world, (3)collecting data, (4) using the data to further refine the model.
Instead, it's stuck at step (0), which is having people clueless about biology babble on web sites. That's all its done for 20 years, and accomplished nothing, because it's just creationism, which is scientifically worthless.