Joined: June 2006
|Quote (Southstar @ Nov. 20 2012,09:47)|
|Quote (Jerry Don Bauer @ Nov. 20 2012,11:28)|
|I just walked you through the analogy of the archer along with how specificity is calculated....how can you guys not grasp that?|
In fact, it's just a take off of the same analogy the inventor of the term CSI used....
But on that, I didn't receive a single comment..LOL....
What is it you wish me to do, I've defined it precisely and showed the thread in very simplistic terms how to use it and what people do with it....It's a very simple concept using high school mathematics (or lower).
The analogy is NOT correct...
You need to multiply the number of archers, define the time per shot, set a total time available, allow for partial "close shots" that summed up give a hit (so as to allow for cumulative aggregation of the acids)
So specificity is (AI)*(FLW). *
Got it. Thanks.
* Argument from incredulity multiplied by the lottery winner fallacy.
"But it's disturbing to think someone actually thinks creationism -- having put it's hand on the hot stove every day for the last 400 years -- will get a different result tomorrow." -- midwifetoad
"I am in a rush to catch up with science work." -- Gary Gaulin