Joined: May 2007
|Quote (midwifetoad @ Oct. 08 2012,17:47)|
|To my bemusement, the "winning" patterns are very simple and regular. As if you could have an oracle that sets "weasel" as the target without knowing the target string.|
What remains of the ID argument is the unevidenced assertion that that are no fitness gradients or plateaus. Gpuccio in particular, treats fitness as entirely one dimensional, and selection always striving for a particular optimum sequence.
He seems unable conceptually to grasp the idea that natural selection sees all aspects of fitness simultaneously.
What those tards don't get is that a GA will generate non conceptual solutions which reach a target (or if you will, create new species) more effectively than most other searches AND can produce entirely different species accross multiple fitness landscapes.
Simply because designers are not as effective as (a random .....snikker)GA.
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his
clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin