Joined: Mar. 2008
To my bemusement, the "winning" patterns are very simple and regular. As if you could have an oracle that sets "weasel" as the target without knowing the target string.
What remains of the ID argument is the unevidenced assertion that that are no fitness gradients or plateaus. Gpuccio in particular, treats fitness as entirely one dimensional, and selection always striving for a particular optimum sequence.
He seems unable conceptually to grasp the idea that natural selection sees all aspects of fitness simultaneously.
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.