Joined: June 2007
Here's what I'm getting at: it might be that the biggest annual changes in the number of de-tards, relative to the tards, would be due to recruitment and mortality, not changing from one group to the other.
And if that is true, then I think several other things are also true.
first, there will always be tard. competing magic vs. not-magic explanations for duh universe aren't just going to go away because all of a sudden tards give a shit about something like that. it's likea two-party system, an evolutionarily stable strategy. science and faith like host and parasite.
two the tard will never change. Even though it was better back in the goodle days (le afdave por exemplor) when they spoke portugese at the tower of bible it is still the same shitty arguments parasitizing the epistemic capital of methodological naturalism
three the tard will always change. Even though it's the same old shit from way back before the goodle days (et tu, materialist) when they had the old time epicurean democritean matter matters, science has progressed.
yet the tard parasitizes that progress, to advance arguments that were not even possible for tards to consider much less, discover,quantify, formulate and falsify.
the tard changes with science, for if there were no science to deny, tard would be simple ritual and punishment
four motives are pretty much the only fucking thing worth talking about, so get over yourselfs
Edited by Erasmus, FCD on Sep. 28 2012,23:30
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK
Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG
the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat
I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles