Joined: April 2007
|Quote (Kattarina98 @ Nov. 23 2012,04:10)|
|Granville Sewell takes scientific discussion to new heights: He has published a YouTube video in which he tells the sad story of "How the Scientific Consensus is Maintained".|
Some minutes into the video, he tells his viewers about
|a 2011Cornell University symposium entitled Biological Information - New Perspectives. .|
And later, he repeats this misinformation. By the way, although ID friends were present,
| ... I don't recall that Intelligent Design was ever mentioned in the talks ...|
Then he whines about the Elsevier's Applied Mathematics Letters affair (mean David vun Kannon! waaah!) and the Springer affair.
Next: Nasty Bob Lloyd attacked him in the Mathematical Intelligencer in March 2012, and Sewell's letter to the editor was rejected - unfair!
Then, he boringly reads out that letter as published in EN&V.
Last complaint: American Journal of Physics rejected his paper, too; it's a conspiracy, surely?
That's the content of 15 minutes of whining, comments are disabled, of course, as they are on UD where he announced the video.
Thanks for the link and the summary. I don't have the nerve to listen to the whole thing.
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."
- William Dembski -