RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (2) < [1] 2 >   
  Topic: A thread for Dr Jammer, who believes in scientific progress.< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Posts: 1901
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 15 2012,12:02   

Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 15 2012,09:29)
Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Feb. 15 2012,11:10)
Intelligent Design, archaeology, forensics, insurance fraud all say they can determine what happens by chance and/ or necessity with what requires agency involvement.

Of those, which has never drawn a conclusion as to the type of "agency" that was involved in any investigation?

Notice anything about that particular odd one out?

They all rely on the evidence to make any inference of the agency. And in the absence of direct observation or designer input the only way to make any scientific determination about the designer(s) or the specific process(es) used is by studying the design.

Not that you would understand that...

I am very ignorant of the claims of ID and nowhere near an expert on the claims of cutting edge evolutionary science, but I am curious about the question of agency raised here. In all of those other fields, the nature of the agent is well understood and the possible actions of the possible agents are well understood. Wouldn't ID need some idea of what sort of actions an agent could make in order to be in that group?

Who said that ev'ry wish would be heard and answered
When wished on the morning star
Somebody thought of that, and someone believed it
Look what it's done so far

The Daily Wingnut

  56 replies since Feb. 10 2012,15:44 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (2) < [1] 2 >   

Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]