BWE
Posts: 1896
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
| Quote (Schroedinger's Dog @ Nov. 28 2011,08:10) | | Quote | | Well, until PZ states otherwise, I see no reason to differentiate between the statements of his followers and those of him. And they have made it quite clear that it is unacceptable to accept anything less than changing the beliefs of {insert target of thoughtcrime}, |
I have to disagree with that statement. You cannot condemn PZ for the vileness of his comenntariat. Well, not directly. Non-refutal is not endorsment. Else, Abbie, for exemple, would be totaly guilty and accountable for every posts at her place (including Byron's!!!), and we, as rational beings, can't have that!
Oh, wait...
Ok, I guess I see your point. |
I directly asked PZ to take responsibility for them or make it clear he would not. He chose the first in a direct reply to me.
ETA: among the sanctioned posts, janine wrote:
All I want for Andy is that he is so deeply shamed that he rethinks what he believes.
Um..
--------------
Who said that ev'ry wish would be heard and answered
When wished on the morning star
Somebody thought of that, and someone believed it
Look what it's done so far
The Daily Wingnut
|
