Joined: Nov. 2011
|Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Nov. 11 2011,09:08)|
|Quote (Southstar @ Nov. 11 2011,08:56)|
|Shouldn't the random cumulative mutations change the bug into a random (but functional) version of a new bug.|
Am I making any sense?
Define "new bug"!
Okay a bug that due to the cumulative passed down mutations is a different genius or family to the original bug.
Let's say that cumulative mutation transmits 1% of mutated DNA from one generation to the other, after 50 generations you should get an interesting amount of mutated DNA.
The numbers are made up, maybe the mutation rate is smaller but that would just push the number of generations needed higher, eventually whatever the amout of generations you need, genetic mutation alone should create a different genius or family right? Now if we do this with a fruit fly it might take us 1000 (depending on mutation rates) years if we do it with e.coli we might need a couple of years.
What it boils down to is that, in the absense of natural selection, do speices evolve randomly.
"Cows who know a moose when they see one will do infinitely better than a cow that pairs with a moose because they cannot see the difference either." Gary Gaulin