Joined: Jan. 2012
|Quote (REC @ Nov. 10 2012,21:40)|
|Barry, conflates the Central Dogma* of molecular biology and evolution in a post titled "Another Irony Alert"|
|Naturally, UB expects that if the denizens of The Skeptical Zone were genuinely skeptical (in the general sense of that word), the “Central Dogma” of Darwinian Evolution would be the first thing about which they would be skeptical. After all, Darwinian Evolution is perhaps the archetypical conventional wisdom of our time. But that is obviously not the case. Instead, The Skeptical Zone is a place where the Central Dogma is zealously defended.|
*Which I think stands, despite reverse transcriptase, if we respect Crick's original proposal.
If you ain't skeptical about my pet peeve, you ain't skeptical!
But, yes, I'd be very interested if they had some evidence of amino acid sequence dictating a nucleic acid sequence. Not verbally, obviously.
If hail is made out of ice and ice came from ice via water, then hail is made out of ice. Joe G
BTW, when you make little jabs like â€śI thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,â€ť you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington