RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 22 2012,11:37   

Quote (sparc @ Oct. 22 2012,02:48)
Wouldn't one expect that those who started the dFSCI et al. game define the term? pure gold TARD

Have they gotten more boring, or have I gotten more bored? Because my first thought was 'what the fuck is dFSCI?' and after reading three comments I thought 'I don't give a SHIT what dFSCI is supposed to be, this shit is worthless'.

They want to paradigm shift from evolution, but they can't find the clutch.

These nimrods need to read their Kuhn. As long as the dominant paradigm is producing metric tons of new research and puzzle solutions, a competing paradigm which answers nothing and just babbles infinitely that the current paradigm is defective will never get anywhere.

   
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]