stevestory
Posts: 13407 Joined: Oct. 2005
|
Quote (sparc @ Oct. 22 2012,02:48) | Wouldn't one expect that those who started the dFSCI et al. game define the term? pure gold TARD |
Have they gotten more boring, or have I gotten more bored? Because my first thought was 'what the fuck is dFSCI?' and after reading three comments I thought 'I don't give a SHIT what dFSCI is supposed to be, this shit is worthless'.
They want to paradigm shift from evolution, but they can't find the clutch.
These nimrods need to read their Kuhn. As long as the dominant paradigm is producing metric tons of new research and puzzle solutions, a competing paradigm which answers nothing and just babbles infinitely that the current paradigm is defective will never get anywhere.
|