midwifetoad
Posts: 3136
Joined: Mar. 2008
|
| Quote (olegt @ Oct. 19 2012,06:53) | gpuccio's design inference is an argument from ignorance:
| Quote | | The second part of the question, for us in ID, is point 2): is a credible mechanism known that can explain the string? The answer for us is simple: it does not exist, because no real explicit and verifiable mechanism has been proposed for this string. So, we infer design. |
Shorter gpuccio:
1. I believe something, that makes it a fact.
2. We don't know how feature X evolved, that means it has been designed. |
Gpuccio is the most literate and knowledgeable of the UD tribe. It is useful to pin him down and get him to admit he simply doesn't accept scientific reasoning.
I do agree with his oft repeated claim that even a five year old can see the obviousness of his invisible continuously acting designer.
--------------
... a poster child for irresponsible and deceitful misrepresentation of design theory on the Internet.
http://tinyurl.com/9axtwbe....9axtwbe
|
