Joined: July 2006
If only R. Dawkins had spent more time naming Weasel things might have all been so very different.
|As for Dawkins’ “weasel” and latching:|
The program was supposed to demonstrate CUMULATIVE selection. And you cannot have cumulative selection if the proper mutations do not latch. Otherwise it would be called back and forth and sometimes cumulative selection.
Perhaps we could also call two steps forward, one step back just "one step forward"?
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand