Joined: Dec. 2006
363 gpuccio October 13, 2012 at 6:19 am:
To Zachriel (at TSZ):
Actually, that’s precisely how we read gpuccio’s statements. He defines functional complexity, excludes those with known causes, then concludes the remaining sequences are designed. Keiths summarized it above.
Your “reading” is terrible, and comnpletely wrong.
Or maybe the problem is on your side, gpuccio. You can't express yourself well and your own thoughts on "dFSCI" keep shifting like sand.
If you are not:
please Logout »