Joined: Sep. 2006
Some more of the "remarkably good" treatment Liddle receives from UD:
|Re Dr EL et al at TSZ: Why do ID/creationists use dice, coins, and alphabets – objects which don’t interact among themselves with these kinds of energies – to calculate probabilities that “prove” that proteins and complex molecules have such a low probability of forming that intelligence is required to assemble them?|
TSZ’s denizens know or should know that this is a loaded, tendentious, atmosphere-poisoning smear by invidious association that builds on an earlier mind closing smear job. Guilt by invidious association is a fallacy.
And Joe at his place:
| Well it seems that the cry-baby evotards have been very busy trying to stick up for one of their own- Elizabeth Liddle. I just read a notice from blogger pertaining to my post in which I called Lizzie a liar, an equivocator and a dried-up old hag. True, I can only provide evidence for the first two- that she is a liar and an equivocator. I just inferred the other from what she writes. The post has been taken down and I will just rewrite it and post it. I told the admin that if required I could easily support my claims in any Court- all but the dried up old hag but that may become evident at the trial.|
Classy, especially given who they're talking about, and that she hasn't been active in the discussion lately.