RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (297) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4213
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 09 2012,05:58   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ June 09 2012,06:21)
Anybody got any cheese to go with Gil's latest whine?
 
Quote
If the thing burns up, is aerodynamically or structurally deficient, and falls apart and goes down in flames, we are proven to be wrong and incompetent.


There is an amusing comment in the thread:
 
Quote
You seem to be comparing science with engineering. They are not the same, and they have different aims.

Seems Gil thinks of himself as a scientist!

Gil, why don't you just design a better 'Darwinism' which will overturn 'Darwinism' as we know it? If you know what everybody else is doing wrong, do it right and show the way!

IDiot

Well, ID burned up and its advocates were proven to be wrong and incompetent.

He wants Darwinism to emulate ID.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

  
  8893 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (297) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]

Visits since January 19th, 2010: