Joined: June 2008
|Quote (JLT @ April 22 2012,13:38)|
|Went into the tard mine once again after successfully resisting for a long while. I think they miss you guys. Seems like Byers is the most prolific commenter over there, now. Heh.|
I seem to have lost some of my tard parsing abilities, though.
|I suppose it is a truism but, really, it’s not about science, metaphysics or religion.|
It’s about simple, inerrant logic and the infantile, even at times, petulant, refusal of ‘naturalists’ to, as you indicate, Gil, follow the evidence where it leads.
That’s the real scandal, which future generations will ponder in appalled incredulity.
We choose our assumptions with our hearts, which can be sensitive to the truth or blank it, often with great emotional intensity, as many of them do, since it is their world-view that is in the balance.
Moral questions arising from the mismatch between the design of the penis and that of the anus could cause great anxiety, to not a few of the militant atheists in the ‘naturalist’ camp; hence the tendency to rage about scientific issues, relating to design.
I guess his argument is YOU R ALL GAY!!!!
Bobby has spent a lot of time thinking about that mismatch, a lot of time.
I’m referring to evolution, not changes in allele frequencies. - Cornelius Hunter
I’m not an evolutionist, I’m a change in allele frequentist! - Nakashima