RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
k.e..



Posts: 3001
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2012,04:19   

Quote (keiths @ Feb. 19 2012,07:30)
ID supporter kuartus:
 
Quote
I would like to see dembski address some of the critisms of his law of conservation which were raised here on UD and other places like scienceblog and rationalwiki.

Kuartus, here's what you need to know about the Law of Conservation of Information:

1) It's not a law;
2) The quantity in question is not conserved; and
3) The quantity in question is not information.

In other words, pure Dembski.

WAIT A MINUTE, HOMO!

EL .EH.DOUBLE U. LAW IS WOTS RITTEN IN BOOKS 'K?

SO.... THOU SHALT NOT COVET THOU CHANCELLOR'S or DEAN'S BROOM CUPBOARD....IS A FRIKKEN LAW...RIGHT?

OK. SO TEH LAW OF CONSERVATIVE IFROMATION IS..... WHO IS ALLOWED TO KNOW STUFF ....RIGHT?


Q FUKKING E dot D DARWINISTS.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"Abbie Smith (ERV) who's got to be the most obnoxious arrogant snot I've ever seen except for when I look in a mirror" DAVE TARD
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus

  
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]