Joined: May 2007
|Quote (keiths @ Feb. 19 2012,07:30)|
|ID supporter kuartus:|
|I would like to see dembski address some of the critisms of his law of conservation which were raised here on UD and other places like scienceblog and rationalwiki.|
Kuartus, here's what you need to know about the Law of Conservation of Information:
1) It's not a law;
2) The quantity in question is not conserved; and
3) The quantity in question is not information.
In other words, pure Dembski.
WAIT A MINUTE, HOMO!
EL .EH.DOUBLE U. LAW IS WOTS RITTEN IN BOOKS 'K?
SO.... THOU SHALT NOT COVET THOU CHANCELLOR'S or DEAN'S BROOM CUPBOARD....IS A FRIKKEN LAW...RIGHT?
OK. SO TEH LAW OF CONSERVATIVE IFROMATION IS..... WHO IS ALLOWED TO KNOW STUFF ....RIGHT?
Q FUKKING E dot D DARWINISTS.
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his
clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin