Joined: Sep. 2006
|Quote (Soapy Sam @ Feb. 12 2012,09:45)|
|Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Feb. 12 2012,07:29)|
|Quote (Soapy Sam @ Feb. 12 2012,04:40)|
|It should be about arguments, not personalities or behaviour.|
oh, that window closed long long long ago, judge jones
Aye ... but one can aspire to Higher Ground. Henceforth I won't let personalities get in the way, and will make sure I home in on the character flaws of anyone who does. And I'll only debate people who - after a succession of lengthy exchanges - I determine to be not worth my time debating.
Anyway you AtBC-ers are all very very immature and I condemn you absolutely. Consider yourselves condemned. I will not stand idly by yadda yadda yadda. The veracity of evolutionary theory is at stake. If you keep misbehavin' it might make it wrong. Can't ya see?
Let us join our voices together on that thought, so that The Argument Regarding Design can be engaged absent the red herrings led away to strawmen soaked in ad hominems and ignited through snidely or crudely incendiary rhetoric to cloud, confuse, poison and polarise the atmosphere.
three four five times by Uncommon Descent.
There is only one Tard. The Tard is One.