Joined: July 2006
|Quote (Dr. Jammer @ Feb. 10 2012,15:25)|
|Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Feb. 10 2012,15:23)|
| † |
|Quote (Dr. Jammer @ Feb. 10 2012,15:17)|
|Let's face reality here, ladies, gentlemen, and chubby guys with oddly-shaped heads: Darwinists are vitriolic monsters who have no problem with squashing dissenters.|
You say that like it's a bad thing.
It's a "bad thing" from the perspective of a rational, civil human being who believes in scientific progress. Someone like me, for example.
Obviously, none of the above applies to you, nor most of the members here. To all of you, so-called "blind watchmaker" evolution (whatever the accepted term for it is nowadays) is a religion. It is your creation story, and, thus, you take challenges to it very personally. That explains the emotional, often vulgar responses to?and hostile treatment of?dissenters.
I don't think it's unreasonable to conclude that there are many similarities between the Islamic extremist and the dogmatic Darwinist. They're convinced they're right, you're convinced you're right. You both believe the infidels should be squashed, you just go about it different ways (murder vs. institutionalized discrimination). I'm willing to bet most of you would happily kill I.D. proponents if it weren't for the consequences (read: prison).
Hey buddy. Pzzst? Wanna buy a thread?
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
if there are even critical flaws in Gaugerís work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand