RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Erasmus, FCD

Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 08 2012,12:12   

Quote (Patrick @ Feb. 08 2012,12:29)
I have a degree in chemical engineering.  The idiotic statements about the second law are raising my blood pressure and sorely tempting me to sock up.
Living organisms arising from non-living matter via unplanned, unguided, blind processes would violate the second law.

Would someone over there please ask him to show the math behind that claim?

in terms of LULZ output, what do you think is the most entertaining thing about "conversations with Joe".  

in my experience i think pushing him until he chimps out and hamfists his keyboard is the best.  but there is definitely something hilarious about him trying to be all calm and collected and "discuss the evidence wherever it may lie"

he says shit like "maybe when evilutionists test stochatsic hypothsess and get they're results rigorously peer reviewed then they will have evidence for they're positions" and I a.l.m.o.s.t. die


You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   

Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]