Joined: May 2006
|Quote (midwifetoad @ Sep. 12 2011,15:02)|
|As a general comment though, this looks like a challenge to ID more than it is to evolutionary scientists. I doubt any evo biologists would have an issue with the idea of an intelligent agent being able to design a living thing. Perhaps a more pertinent and direct challenge would be to show that supernatural intervention is not required to create life – when no material intelligent agent already exists – otherwise it is just inviting infinite regress (is a supernatural event required to produce the non supernatural intelligence that designed the life or do we invoke another material designer as the designer of the designer)|
This requires a bit of head spinning. What kind of non-supernatural entity designs the first life?
If none is required, how is this different from naturalism? If it is required, the contest is won.
The loudspeaker in the ceiling just deleted most of DrBot's post, specifically the part I quoted above.
Hardly surprising. Barry seems to construct elaborate rhetorical traps in his mind and can't seem to handle it when his presumed opponent deviates from the script Barry so helpfully wrote for him/her.
It's natural to be curious about our world, but the scientific method is just one theory about how to best understand it. We live in a democracy, which means we should treat every theory equally. - Steven Colbert, I Am America (and So Can You!)