Joined: Jan. 2006
|Quote (Kris @ Jan. 25 2011,17:21)|
|Quote (Louis @ Jan. 25 2011,08:53)|
|Quote (Kris @ Jan. 25 2011,15:57)|
It's funny that you quoted the words above. Obviously it hasn't occurred to you or a lot of other people here that everything any of you argue has been argued by you and others many, many, many times. Apparently you think that your arguments are fresh and profound but any argument you don't want to hear is redundant and boring.
Ok sweetie, I'll bite. Which areguments are these then? Please give details and be as specific as possibl. Now I know you've had trouble with that in the past, but try very hard and you might just make it.
"Which areguments are these then?" (sic)
The ones you and most other people here and on Panda's Thumb, Pharyngula, etc. keep making over and over and over and over and over and over and over and .......
You know, that science, scientists, and zealous science supporters are perfect and religious people suck. That pretty much covers most of what is ever said.
Oh shit did I make a typo? Well done for spotting it, thanks Kris.
Now, those arguments were what precisely? Details, old bean, I crave details.
P.S. I'm not sure I've ever said (or ever would say) that scientists are perfect (I am one, I work, and have worked with lots of them, neither they, not I, am perfect). Same goes for zealous science supporters. But hey. You're infantile projections, distortions and false equivalences are really all you have aren't they? Shit, you're even funnier than I thought!