Joined: June 2008
|Quote (OgreMkV @ June 20 2012,12:40)|
So, a significant amount of evidence, from an unrelated field that supports evolution and you still can't be bothered to actually TALK ABOUT INTELLIGENT DESIGN?
According to JoeG, ID is not anti-evolution. †Is that true? †If so, then why do you spend so much time attacking evolution instead of looking for support for ID?
If it's not true, then you should go explain that to JoeG and a few other of the ID supports, because they are saying a lot of wrong things.
BTW: My most often used statement applies here. Even if you totally disprove evolutionary theory in all it's particulars and all it's supporting evidence, that doesn't automatically make ID (or creationism or anything else) right. †Only positive supporting evidence can do that... and you still aren't looking for it.
Ogre, to be charitable, he _is_ looking for it, in the same way as a drunk looks for his car keys under the street lamp. In this case, a Bible shaped street lamp.
Iím referring to evolution, not changes in allele frequencies. - Cornelius Hunter
Iím not an evolutionist, Iím a change in allele frequentist! - Nakashima