sledgehammer
Posts: 532
Joined: Sep. 2008
|
| Quote (SLP @ May 17 2010,15:43) | Has anyone else read any of Abel's papers and concluded, like I have, that
1. I am astonished at how such nonsense gets past peer review
2. question begging shoiuld not be considered a valid scientific endeavor? |
Not only that, but when i read a paper full of jargon of the author's own creation, | Quote | | “Physicodynamics cannot spontaneously traverse The Cybernetic Cut ” |
using circular definitions (like CSI and IC: that which cannot be produced by natural causes) , followed by the challenge "prove me wrong! (but I get to make the rules)": | Quote | A single exception of non trivial, unaided spontaneous optimization of formal function by truly
natural process would falsify this null hypothesis. |
I can only roll my eyes and shrug.
--------------
The majority of the stupid is invincible and guaranteed for all time. The terror of their tyranny is alleviated by their lack of consistency. -A. Einstein (H/T, JAD)
If evolution is true, you could not know that it's true because your brain is nothing but chemicals. ?Think about that. -K. Hovind
|
