Joined: Sep. 2008
|Quote (SLP @ May 17 2010,15:43)|
|Has anyone else read any of Abel's papers and concluded, like I have, that|
1. I am astonished at how such nonsense gets past peer review
2. question begging shoiuld not be considered a valid scientific endeavor?
Not only that, but when i read a paper full of jargon of the author's own creation,
using circular definitions (like CSI and IC: that which cannot be produced by natural causes) , followed by the challenge "prove me wrong! (but I get to make the rules)":
|“Physicodynamics cannot spontaneously traverse The Cybernetic Cut ”|
| A single exception of non trivial, unaided spontaneous optimization of formal function by truly|
natural process would falsify this null hypothesis.
I can only roll my eyes and shrug.
The majority of the stupid is invincible and guaranteed for all time. The terror of their tyranny is alleviated by their lack of consistency. -A. Einstein (H/T, JAD)
If evolution is true, you could not know that it's true because your brain is nothing but chemicals. ?Think about that. -K. Hovind