RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (4) < [1] 2 3 4 >   
  Topic: BIO-Complexity, the shiny new ID journal< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Posts: 533
Joined: Sep. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: May 17 2010,19:27   

Quote (SLP @ May 17 2010,15:43)
Has anyone else read any of Abel's papers and concluded, like I have, that
1. I am astonished at how such nonsense gets past peer review
2. question begging shoiuld not be considered a valid scientific endeavor?

Not only that, but when i read a paper  full of jargon of the author's own creation,    
“Physicodynamics cannot spontaneously traverse The Cybernetic Cut ”
using circular definitions (like CSI and IC: that which cannot be produced by natural causes) , followed by the challenge "prove me wrong! (but I get to make the rules)":  
A single exception of non trivial, unaided spontaneous optimization of formal function by truly
   natural process would falsify this null hypothesis.

I can only roll my eyes and  shrug.

The majority of the stupid is invincible and guaranteed for all time. The terror of their tyranny is alleviated by their lack of consistency. -A. Einstein  (H/T, JAD)
If evolution is true, you could not know that it's true because your brain is nothing but chemicals. ?Think about that. -K. Hovind

  99 replies since May 13 2010,21:56 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (4) < [1] 2 3 4 >   

Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]