Joined: July 2007
|Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Jan. 11 2019,14:18)|
|Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 11 2019,14:13)|
|Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Jan. 11 2019,14:09)|
|Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 11 2019,13:59)|
|Quote (fnxtr @ Jan. 11 2019,13:52)|
|Well that was fun.|
Besides the binary categorization of designed/not designed, what have ID scientists learned in the last 20 years or so?
And how is this binary categorization helpful?
What is its practical use for biologists?
Where does a scientist go from "This was designed"?
From "this was designed" now we have new and interesting questions to explore. And we would start looking for that something besides physics and chemistry that ID says exists (in living organisms).
Like what Joke? What new questions will "design" open for exploration and how will they be tested? Biggest question is why haven't any IDiots been exploring them?
timmy Horton is totally ignorant of science.
What new questions opened up when Stonehenge was determined to be intelligently designed?
How is a murder investigated differently from a natural death? What new questions does murder open up?
timmy, you must be one of the most ignorant and angry, pathetic cowards, ever.
It is very telling that you never ante up
Joke the chickenshit coward avoids every question. What a surprise. :D
YOU are the IDIOT, timmy. ID is NOT about those other questions so IDists would nit be exploring them unless they wanted to. They have their own agenda and they are not bound to an asinine agenda of a scientifically illiterate evoTARD
Chromosomes. are. all. connected. It is one long polymer. Called the DNA. - oleg t
simple English (hint: "equal" and "interchangeable" aren't synonyms)- JohnW
"Genetic mutations are mistakes"- evolutionary biology
"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"- Intelligent Design and Timothy Horton