Joined: Feb. 2006
|Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 11 2019,13:32)|
|Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Jan. 11 2019,13:23)|
|Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 11 2019,12:17)|
|Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Jan. 11 2019,11:39)|
|Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 11 2019,09:05)|
|Quote (fnxtr @ Jan. 10 2019,22:55)|
|Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 10 2019,18:47)|
|Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Jan. 10 2019,20:42)|
ID has definitely determined Design in biological life but ID scientists can't do any research until Design in biological life is determined.
Wrong, moron. The ID science is in the detection and STUDY of the design.
ID SCIENTISTS STUDY DESIGN:
Again, ID will gladly take the Pepsi challenge against the shit you have for "science".
you YEC science pusher? Will your YEC science take the challenge too?
And yes, YEC will also gladly go against materialism, which is a total brain-fart non-starter.
Why don't you do a YEC science vs. ID science?
As for ID vs YEC-> as I have said all along YEC is a subset of ID.
ID = no predictions, no evidence, no testable hypotheses.
YEC = no predictions, no evidence, its few testable hypotheses already falsified.
The only difference I see is YEC was brave enough to make some testable claims unlike the chickenshit IDiot liars.
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"I'm a female retired marine biologist"
Whizz-dumb from Joe "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest female impersonator YEC.