RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (277) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Joe G.'s Tardgasm, How long can it last?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 10 2012,10:13   

Joe is asked:
Quote
what does I.D. predict in relation to there being an objective nested hierarchy in a biosphere?

Joe's reply:
Quote
Evolutionism definitely doesnít predict one.

Is that right? Did you learn your debating skills in the playground Joe?

Seems to me that if "Evolutionism" did not exist then I.D would not either as I.D is only about "Evolutionism" and perceived holes.

If ID could stand on it's own two feet without being simply a gap in something else Joe would be able to answer the question.

Let me repeat that one more time.

Joe is asked:
Quote
what does I.D. predict in relation to there being an objective nested hierarchy in a biosphere?


Joe's reply:
Quote
Evolutionism definitely doesnít predict one.

So Joe your best answer to a question about ID is to ignore it and pretend you were actually asked about what ID is trying to replace?

You already know that "Evolutionism" is wrong, so what possible relevance can it be that it does not predict X? If it's wrong it's wrong and can be simply ignored.

The fact that you can't ignore it even if you claim it's wrong is evidence that ID is simply a parasite on actual science. Remove the host and the parasite shrivels up.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gaugerís work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
  8280 replies since Feb. 24 2010,12:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (277) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]