Joined: May 2007
|Quote (Soapy Sam @ Sep. 25 2012,14:48)|
|Quote (DaveH @ Sep. 24 2012,16:27)|
|Don't know if this has been spotted... Our Hero turns up on The Loom.|
Same old, same old contentless pish, nothing to see here.
He manages to completely reverse the role of sex:
|There is no hope for evolution once sex hits the scene as it would take many more generations to do the same thing|
Then brings 'geneticist' Sermonti in to support this horseshit:
|whenever absent-minded Venus has taken the upper hand, forms have forgotten to make progress. |
Which would explain why the tree of eukaryotes is overwhelmingly sexual, from root to twig-tip? And why most asexual eukaryotic lineages are short-lived on evolutionary timescales? And why GAs are turbo-charged by crossover?
I noticed Joe made no mention of caek or dihydrogen monoxide.
I think he should consider another Lobotomy.
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his
clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin