Joined: Jan. 2012
|Quote (DaveH @ Sep. 24 2012,16:27)|
|Don't know if this has been spotted... Our Hero turns up on The Loom.|
Same old, same old contentless pish, nothing to see here.
He manages to completely reverse the role of sex:
|There is no hope for evolution once sex hits the scene as it would take many more generations to do the same thing|
Then brings 'geneticist' Sermonti in to support this horseshit:
|whenever absent-minded Venus has taken the upper hand, forms have forgotten to make progress. |
Which would explain why the tree of eukaryotes is overwhelmingly sexual, from root to twig-tip? And why most asexual eukaryotic lineages are short-lived on evolutionary timescales? And why GAs are turbo-charged by crossover?
SoapySam is a pathetic asswiper. Joe G
BTW, when you make little jabs like “I thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,” you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington