RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (513) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Joe G.'s Tardgasm, How long can it last?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 29 2012,16:15   

Quote (iconofid @ Aug. 29 2012,15:42)
Quote (Tracy P. Hamilton @ Aug. 29 2012,15:14)
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Aug. 29 2012,14:56)
Quote (midwifetoad @ Aug. 29 2012,14:47)

Joe August 29, 2012 at 1:33 pm

For the record, the translation of nucleotides into amino acids is not a chemical reaction and cannot be described by chemical reactions.

Therefor what dr who sez about “that’s all we observe when we actually physically examine life” demonstrates either deception or ignorance on his part.

JoeTard provides more "no way anyone could possibly be that stupid!" moments than all the other IDiots put together.

For the record, and oh what a record of IDiocy it is!

If Joe wishes to equivocate on the definition of chemical reaction (whether dimer formation without forming covalent bonds is a "reaction" etc), the argument is still stupid.

Joe's actually disputing dr. who's claim (on TSZ) that life is a chemical phenomenon.

So he mentions something in life which is a chemical phenomenon.  :D

Well done Joe!

Because everyone knows RNA is transcribed using a sonic screwdriver.

Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

  15374 replies since Feb. 24 2010,12:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (513) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   

Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]