Joined: July 2006
|Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 11 2010,09:37)|
Do you really think your ignorance helps your case?
Ignorance of what? Your "argument"? Seems like the entire biological community is doing just fine without your "input".
Interesting how you pretend I did not ask a question. I know that you have problems supporting your position, but if you could tell me which has more information (and how much more), an Aardvark or bacterial flagellum, that would go a long way to proving your case that ID deals in "information" and that you can quantify it.
|Even if ID is bunk you still couldn't support your position.|
And that's why "my position" is the default one and your position is doing so well in the courts, in schools, in journals.
I mean, look at the support that ID has for it's position
A journal that has not published in 5 years.
I take that bothers you.
It seems to bother you, in fact it seems to bother you so much that you are here. Why not go to UD or TT and shout into the echo chamber?
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
if there are even critical flaws in Gaugerís work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand