JohnW
Posts: 2825
Joined: Aug. 2006
|
| Quote (FloydLee @ Nov. 05 2009,11:17) | | Quote | | WHICH IS THE POINT! |
I think the two points are that:
(1) Very specific, empirically observable ID falsifiers have been presented by G and R. You don't accept them, but you are unable to refute them either.
(2) You haven't read the book The Privileged Planet. |
1. How about telling us what these "very specific, observable ID falsifiers" are? You've presented none so far.
2. No, I haven't. I don't have time to read all the good books, without wasting time on bad ones. If you think it's a good book and worthy of my time, go ahead and try to convince me.
--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers
There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"... Â The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG
|
