Joined: Aug. 2006
|Quote (FloydLee @ Nov. 05 2009,11:17)|
|WHICH IS THE POINT!|
I think the two points are that:
(1) †Very specific, empirically observable ID falsifiers have been presented by G and R. †You don't accept them, but you are unable to refute them either. †
(2) †You haven't read the book The Privileged Planet.
1. How about telling us what these "very specific, observable ID falsifiers" are? You've presented none so far.
2. No, I haven't. I don't have time to read all the good books, without wasting time on bad ones. If you think it's a good book and worthy of my time, go ahead and try to convince me.
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers
There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"... ¬†The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG