RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (100) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: FL "Debate Thread", READ FIRST POST BEFORE PARTICIPATING PLZ< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
deadman_932



Posts: 3094
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Sep. 22 2009,13:21   

Nom, nom nom nom.

Notice that in my post (which floyd challenged) I qualified my point:

Quote
"Reject Physics, if it claims that Genesis isn't LITERALLY "true" in all aspects. Reject Genetics if it says sheep don't change colors because of sticks placed near them, or reject Chemistry if it says that water cannot be *literally* turned into wine by instantaneous miraculous transmutation."


By "literally" I am referring to Floyd's YEC-literalist views. But Floyd ABANDONS that suddenly?

To make the irrelevant claim that a non-literalist view can be compatible with deep time?

Who cares? the issue was YOUR literalist brand of thinking, Floyd. If you are NOT a YEC, then say so. If you are, then my point is perfectly apropos to YOUR YECist literalism.

But you tried to shift the goalposts?

FOR SHAME !!!111Shift!!1

HOW CAN YOU BE TRUSTED NOW IN ANYTHING YOU SAY?

--------------
AtBC Award for Thoroughness in the Face of Creationism

  
  2975 replies since Sep. 12 2009,22:15 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (100) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]