OgreMkV
Posts: 2987
Joined: Oct. 2009
|
| Quote (Henry J @ Oct. 29 2011,00:34) | What I counted:
"if evolution were a real science, " - this pretends that it isn't.
"biologists would be able to predict what the next species to evolve would be, " - the theory doesn't imply ability to predict that level of detail.
"as well as which population groups within a species " - same fallacy as in previous line.
"were more evolved than the norm. " - there's no such thing as "norm". (unless you're watching Cheers.)
(Although I suppose the 2nd and 3rd ones in that list could be considered duplicates; they just refer to different sized groups.)
Henry |
There's no such thing as 'more evolved' either. 'More evolved' implies that a population has a history that is longer than other populations.
--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.
http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat
|
