Joined: Jan. 2009
|Quote (Ftk @ Aug. 31 2011,20:42)|
|Quote (OgreMkV @ Aug. 31 2011,13:50)|
|Quote (Ftk @ Aug. 31 2011,13:41)|
|In regard to gnostic writings, please bear in mind the late dates that most of those were written in comparison to the books that were included in scripture.|
Also, back to the early church fathers. Certain books were not accepted for good reason...some didn't even yet exist...others obviously were in total contrast to what 1st hand witnesses attested to in their writings.
Name one first hand witness of Jesus that can be shown to have written a book of the Bible (any Bible).
Plenty evidence of that, but I'm sure you've read it all, as you seem to think you're a theologian. I'm not offering anymore links...find them yourselves. Most refuse to read and those who do scan and throw up strawmen.
Then again, anything you read that supports early writers and witnesses, you'll wave off as incorrect even if you have no solid evidence to refute the fact. Get into the early church father's. Eye opener.
Just flounce already!
there is not a SINGLE scripture attributed to a first hand eyewitness of the events regarding the J man.
Ever heard of the Q document?
"Hail is made out of water? Are you really that stupid?" Joe G
"I have a better suggestion, Kris. How about a game of hide and go fuck yourself instead." Louis
"The reason people use a crucifix against vampires is that vampires are allergic to bullshit" Richard Pryor