Joined: Feb. 2006
Olegt points out ...
|And he's already milking it.|
Yeah, and more ...
commissioning editor referred it to his colleague, who subjected it to a
thorough and competent scientific review.
See how he's building a case for it being "peer reviewed", as a counter to the APS pointing out that the Physics and Society Newsletter is not a journal, and not peer reviewed.
Damage control on this one's going to be ongoing and difficult. Every time the climate science community talks about the scientific consensus, Monckton's "invited, peer reviewed paper" is going to be trotted out.
The man's a politician, complaints about his competency don't lie in that realm ...