RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (53) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Science Break, Selected Shorts< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
dvunkannon



Posts: 1376
Joined: June 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Aug. 26 2012,10:07   

Quote (midwifetoad @ Aug. 23 2012,11:14)
The neural net would be the population. In the simplest view, what gets selected is associations. In the behaviorist model what gets selected is tendencies to do specific things in specific contexts.

In a physiological  view, each neuron must have something equivalent to genes, a storage system that determines its contextual responses. Something that can vary and also store.

Where's febble?

So in this analogy, the population is the set of neurons, the individual is the neuron and the gene is some stable aspect of the neuron, like excitation threshold.

What is not captured is the connectivity, and in learning it is the strength of these connections that varies.

So I'm still not seeing evolution as a good analogy to learning, or vice versa.

--------------
I’m referring to evolution, not changes in allele frequencies. - Cornelius Hunter
I’m not an evolutionist, I’m a change in allele frequentist! - Nakashima

  
  1566 replies since July 16 2008,08:10 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (53) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]