RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (2) < [1] 2 >   
  Topic: Why ID doesn't look like Real Design Detection, Reed's entrance exam for FTK< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
stevestory



Posts: 10490
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: July 15 2008,23:33   

I'm not sure it doesn't deserve its own thread, i just thought you meant this to be a topic for ftk when you ended the post with

Quote
So FTK:
ID proponents like to use archeology as an example of design detection, but why doesn't real world design detection look anything like ID theory ? Why can't these archeologists just calculate the CSI of those pigment blocks and run it through the 'nixplanatory filter ?


If it's supposed to be a serious exploration of why why scientists, historians, forensic specialists, etc don't use Dembski's absurd method, then that's an interesting question deserving of its own thread, but not one which ftk really has the ability to understand or discuss.

(editad to fix teh grammars!)

Edited by stevestory on July 16 2008,00:34

   
  32 replies since July 15 2008,18:17 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (2) < [1] 2 >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]