Joined: Feb. 2006
In 1979, I originator the mathematical analysis that shows that the production of and alterations in the behavior of any natural-system are intelligently designed. My analysis (the GID-model, GID) is not related, in method, to the inadequate mostly insignificant and highly criticized Johnson-Dembski-Behe theory (RID) as championed by members of the Discovery Institute.
E = mc2 is Not Einsteins Discovery
Robert A. Herrmann
(9 SEPT 2000. Revised 1 JAN 2004)
"The facts are, that I have never seen a rigorous single and exact proof that E = mc2
is a universal law for all possible scenarios. However, Einsteins 1905 proof is in error
and this is not due to the fact that a first ordered approximation is used."
7. Final E = mc2 Remarks
PoincarŽe, Hasenšohrl, and Planck are not the only individuals that have a certain
priority relative to E = mMc2. According to Professor Umberto Bartocci, Olinto De Pretto
published the expression E = mc2 in the science magazine (2) in 1903.
There is no doubt in my mind that Einstein
would have known of the last Hasenšohrl paper since it appeared in the principle journal
that Einstein used six months later to publish his own (1905) derivation.
E = N minus C2
Remainder = N (last) minus I (first)
Remainder = N (end) minus I (beginning)
5 = 14 minus 9 (The first will be last)
The kingdom of heaven is NI
360 miracles and more at:
Great news. Gods wife is pregnant! (Rev. 12:5)
It's not over till the fat lady sings! (Isa. 54:1 & Zec 9:9)