Joined: April 2007
Hi creeky belly,
|Unless you're dealing with superconductors, optical qubits, ion traps, or cavity QED, there's no way to keep the quantum state from reverting to a classical state (300 ms is way too long). I think you could make a strong case that this is probably not a quantum effect they're observing.|
I am going to guess what you mean by "way too long". Max Tegmark suggested the brain so wet, warm and noisy that it would force an almost immediate decoherence.
Penrose offers E=h/t as the equation for determining timing of decoherence where E is gravitational energy, h (h bar) is Planck’s constant over 2 pi and t is time. The more mass that is involved the shorter the Objective Reduction (OR) because when E is large, t is small. The tubulin dimers in microtubules are small enough that they can avoid decoherence for a long time as long as they remain isolated from large mass.
Here is a paper from Hameroff discussing the timing of consciousness. It includes discussions on Libet, cutaneous rabbit and the “color phi” phenomenon. These scientific observations support the idea that consciousness transcends time on the order of 100s of milliseconds. Hameroff describes how and why the quantum effects in neural microtubules organized in dendritic structures for processing could and would account for these observations.
You have mentioned multiple artificial ways for quantum effects to last 100s of milliseconds. Is it so hard to consider that billions of years of evolution could do the same thing naturally?