Joined: April 2007
When MikeGene and I get into heated discussions it is usually over what I call "Shield Bashing".
A lot of people at Telic Thoughts (including MikeGene) take the tactical position of claiming to be oppressed. It makes it easier to complain.
Bradford takes it to an extreme. He appears to be fairly knowledgeable but often uses that knowledge to be bombastic.
BTW, I don't know if you are aware of this. I think MikeGene split off from the "ID community" to form Telic Thoughts because of fundamental disagreements with people running ARN.
Personally, I think there was a spark of earnest interest in doing science when Darwin's Black Box came out. I agree with Dawkins' review that DBB was better, in this regard, than Edge of Evolution.
I suggest the ID MOVEMENT decided to go the PR route. Behe changed his definition of IC and the one ID Hypothesis that came close to being scientific, EAM, was abandoned.
In short, I think you are pressing some hot buttons with MikeGene. Yes, he is biased in blaming the “ID critics” for shutting down explorations but note the title bar declaration “Thoughts is an independent blog about intelligent design. Telic Thoughts is an independent blog about intelligent design.”
The word “independent” is obviously intentional. If there is an “ID Community”, MikeGene and Telic Thoughts don’t consider themselves part of it.
You may also want to look at their “About Us” description.
There is some history there.