RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (117) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Telic Thoughts Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 25 2011,03:45   

Sal:
Quote
A specific criticism of CTMU as an ID theory is that it has yet to show itself as an operationally applicable theory to physical reality.

Notions developed by other ID proponents and creationists have led to testable predictions both in the lab and field. CTMU is not there, nor do I expect it to be. It is a philosophical view of reality, not an operational science as far as I can tell.


Like what Sal? Anybody care to ask?

http://telicthoughts.com/blast-f....-265789

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gaugerís work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
  3492 replies since Sep. 22 2007,13:50 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (117) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]