Joined: July 2006
|A specific criticism of CTMU as an ID theory is that it has yet to show itself as an operationally applicable theory to physical reality.|
Notions developed by other ID proponents and creationists have led to testable predictions both in the lab and field. CTMU is not there, nor do I expect it to be. It is a philosophical view of reality, not an operational science as far as I can tell.
Like what Sal? Anybody care to ask?
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand