J-Dog
Posts: 4303
Joined: Dec. 2006
|
| Quote (kevinmillerxi @ Feb. 26 2008,01:55) | | Steve: For the record, I said, "ID seems to be an attempt to call science back to a more empirical approach--at least according to the rhetoric I've heard from ID advocates." You seem to have missed that qualifier. For a good discussion on this, I'd highly recommend "Science's Blind Spot" by Cornelius Hunter. |
Kevin - This is the same Cornelius Hunter than ran away crying from this blog last year!
He couldn't tell the difference between a wolf and a thalycine!
And his "science book source" was a Comic Book!
Cornelius Hunter??!!
added in edit: Ha! Found the link:
http://www.antievolution.org/aebb-ar....ad.html
--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10
Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08
UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11
|
