|"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank
Joined: Feb. 2005
|Quote (Paul Nelson @ July 18 2007,07:07)|
|Traits characterizing the reptile/mammal transition are not based on similarity in size.|
Of course. So why not depict the fossils at their actual size, then, rather than (without telling the reader) drawing some much larger, and others much smaller?
Why not explain why _Diarthrognathus_ has two jaw joints -- one mammalian, one reptilian.
And why not explain why all this "therapsids" crapola is lifted nearly intact from Gish's writings at ICR from twenty-five years ago? Since, ya know, "teach the controversy" doesn't have anything -- anything at all whatsoever -- to do with either creation "science" or intelligent design "theory".
Paul, ever wonder why everyone thinks creationists/IDers are dishonest evasive deceptive deliberate liars?
Think maybe books like this one have something to do with that?
Editor, Red and Black Publishers