Joined: July 2006
|Quote (Paul Nelson @ July 18 2007,07:07)|
|Traits characterizing the reptile/mammal transition are not based on similarity in size.|
Of course. So why not depict the fossils at their actual size, then, rather than (without telling the reader) drawing some much larger, and others much smaller?
maybe because if they did not do that some would have been bigger then the page itself and some would have been too small to see clearly.
Or is that being too logical for this discussion?
I find the "without telling the reader" comment laughable, as already on this thread there are loads of things that EE does not tell the reader! I call shenanigans!
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand